4 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. Nicole Mirkin's avatar

The way you link hedging to the emotional politics of a room is spot on. Most people don’t hedge because they’re unsure — they hedge because they’re managing invisible dynamics. The alternatives you offer aren’t just better wording; they’re better boundaries.

Clarity is a leadership tool long before it’s a communication skill.

Neural Foundry's avatar

The framing of hedging as trading credibility for comfort is spot on. What I find especially useful is how you connect linguistic choices to the unspoken power dynamics in the room, because that's where most hedging actually originates. The shift from 'does that make sense?' to 'what questions do you have?' isn't just cleaner phrasing, it fundamentally reframes who holds the burden of clairty in the conversation.

Dr. Nicole Mirkin's avatar

This captures something psychologically accurate about language and power: hedging isn’t about uncertainty, it’s about managing social threat. The moment you name how phrasing redistributes responsibility in a room, it stops being a communication tip and becomes a leadership skill. Clarity isn’t dominance—it’s containment.

Mateja Verlic Bruncic's avatar

Agree... I think :) No, I agree.